Re: why IPv6 is bad, No, SMTP is IPv4, Was: SMTP and IPv6

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: IETF general list <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: why IPv6 is bad, No, SMTP is IPv4, Was: SMTP and IPv6
From: John Curran <jcurran@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2024 18:34:23 -0400
In-reply-to: <f80b7b0b-cef9-44c3-82ed-e5037806614d@gmail.com>
References: <20240702140709.GA2376424@bit.hackerfactor.com> <v615da$2q8p$1@gal.iecc.com> <33055808-1a1b-4db0-85cb-2517c83234c5@gmail.com> <45cc2574-55ca-a0a0-86f6-c8afdc5fcc9d@taugh.com> <f80b7b0b-cef9-44c3-82ed-e5037806614d@gmail.com>

"As an Internet engineering discussion grows longer, the probability of it becoming gripes about IPv6 approaches 1."

<chuckle> 
/John

p.s. disclaimer: my views alone - note that this message is composed of 100% recycled electrons.

References:
- Re: No, SMTP is IPv4, Was: SMTP and IPv6
  - From: Dr. Neal Krawetz
- Re: why IPv6 is bad, No, SMTP is IPv4, Was: SMTP and IPv6
  - From: John Levine
- Re: why IPv6 is bad, No, SMTP is IPv4, Was: SMTP and IPv6
  - From: Brian E Carpenter
- Re: why IPv6 is bad, No, SMTP is IPv4, Was: SMTP and IPv6
  - From: John R Levine
- Re: why IPv6 is bad, No, SMTP is IPv4, Was: SMTP and IPv6
  - From: Brian E Carpenter

Prev by Date: Re: RFPs and IPv6
Next by Date: [Last-Call] Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa-13
Previous by thread: Re: why IPv6 is bad, No, SMTP is IPv4, Was: SMTP and IPv6
Next by thread: Re: why IPv6 is bad, No, SMTP is IPv4, Was: SMTP and IPv6
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Mhonarc] [Fedora Users]

Powered by Linux