For the comment about the IPR, the IPR for the draft at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-ietf-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa
says that draft-ietf-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa has replaced the
individual draft
Thanks
Ahmed
On 3/2/24 1:50 AM, Roni Even via Datatracker wrote:
Reviewer: Roni Even
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more information, please see the FAQ at
<https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>.
Document: draft-ietf-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa-??
Reviewer: Roni Even
Review Date: 2024-03-02
IETF LC End Date: 2024-03-05
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
Summary: the document is ready for publication as a standard track RTC with nits
Major issues:
Minor issues:
Nits/editorial comments:
1. Noticed that there is an IPR statement for the individual draft. Why there
is no IPR statement for the WG document?
2. Was there a discussion to have the document as informational or experimental
and not standard track?
--
last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx
