Hi Russ,
Thank you for the review.
Regarding the updating of an IRTF document we're going to go with whatever the considered opinion of the IESG/IRTF is.
Meanwhile, thanks for the nit.
Cheers,
Rick
On Wed, 12 Jun 2024 at 16:12, Russ Housley via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Reviewer: Russ Housley
Review result: Not Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more information, please see the FAQ at
<https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>.
Document: draft-ietf-dtn-ipn-update-11
Reviewer: Russ Housley
Review Date: 2024-06-12
IETF LC End Date: Already complete
IESG Telechat date: 2024-06-20
Summary: Not Ready
Major Concerns:
RFC 7116 is an Informational RFC, and this document, if approved, will
be published an an RFC on the standards track. It is very unusual for
a standards-track RFC to update an Informational RFC. I suggest that
this document and a companion document ought to obsolete RFC 7116, where
the companion document separately handles all of the non-ipn topics in
RFC 7116. The companion document can be an informational RFC.
Minor Concerns:
None
Nits:
Section 5.5: s/security source EID for/security source for/
-- last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx
