Interesting what ChatGPT replied, and how it was re-worded. Perhaps the re-worded one is not appropriate for the list either, although more professional. Bonnie L. Gorsic 714-742-4906 (mobile) -----Original Message----- From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx> Sent: Monday, June 10, 2024 9:54 PM To: Rob Sayre <sayrer@xxxxxxxxx>; Gorsic (US), Bonnie L <bonnie.l.gorsic@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Nick Hilliard <nick@xxxxxxxxxx>; Ted Lemon <mellon@xxxxxxxxx>; Chris Box <chris.box.ietf@xxxxxxxxx>; Ofer Inbar <cos@xxxxxxxxx>; Moderators <moderators@xxxxxxxx>; IETF discussion list <ietf@xxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: [Last-Call] Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: L2 posting rights restriction EXT email: be mindful of links/attachments. On 11-Jun-24 15:50, Rob Sayre wrote: > On Mon, Jun 10, 2024 at 12:59 PM Gorsic (US), Bonnie L <bonnie.l.gorsic@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:bonnie.l.gorsic@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > > Why not use AI to monitor his posts and if offensive words are used, don’t allow them on the list? > > > Interesting. I suggest you write up an Internet-Draft describing this idea in more detail. Let's try the running code approach. Here's my recent dialogue with ChatGPT. I was slightly amazed: Brian: Please decide if the following message text meets normal professional standards: "<text of the message in question>" ChatGPT: The message text does not meet normal professional standards. The comment on <name>'s appearance is inappropriate and unprofessional in a work-related context. The invitation to lunch could be seen as personal rather than professional, particularly when paired with the preceding comment. Here is a revised version that maintains professionalism: "Thanks, <name>. I appreciate your help with this matter. Perhaps we could catch up over lunch at the next IETF meeting to discuss our projects further?" Brian
