+1
-Joseph
On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 4:46 PM Pete Resnick <resnick@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Joseph,
Thanks for the review. I think this is one of those cases where, "it's
been written that way for 23 years; probably best to leave it alone."
:-)
pr
--
Pete Resnick https://www.episteme.net/
All connections to the world are tenuous at best
On 13 May 2024, at 10:34, Joseph Yee via Datatracker wrote:
> Reviewer: Joseph Yee
> Review result: Ready
>
> Greeting all,
>
> I've reviewed the draft "draft-ietf-emailcore-rfc5322bis" version 11
> and the
> draft is ready with some 'personal preference' nits.
>
> There are places with 'header fields' where 'header section' might be
> a better
> term. They are at Section 3.5 1st paragraph and 3rd paragraph as it
> is about
> the information in the 'header section'. However, I considered it more
> into
> personal preference rather than nits (or editorials that must be
> fixed). If
> editors/chairs or others considered 'header fields' is a better term I
> don't
> see any concern. 'Header Fields' are used in other places in the
> draft (such
> as section 2.2 and 3.6) and they are good that there's no need to
> change.
>
> Best Regards,
> Joseph Yee
-- last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx
