Hi Joseph,
Thanks for the review. I think this is one of those cases where, "it's
been written that way for 23 years; probably best to leave it alone."
:-)
pr
--
Pete Resnick https://www.episteme.net/
All connections to the world are tenuous at best
On 13 May 2024, at 10:34, Joseph Yee via Datatracker wrote:
Reviewer: Joseph Yee
Review result: Ready
Greeting all,
I've reviewed the draft "draft-ietf-emailcore-rfc5322bis" version 11
and the
draft is ready with some 'personal preference' nits.
There are places with 'header fields' where 'header section' might be
a better
term. They are at Section 3.5 1st paragraph and 3rd paragraph as it
is about
the information in the 'header section'. However, I considered it more
into
personal preference rather than nits (or editorials that must be
fixed). If
editors/chairs or others considered 'header fields' is a better term I
don't
see any concern. 'Header Fields' are used in other places in the
draft (such
as section 2.2 and 3.6) and they are good that there's no need to
change.
Best Regards,
Joseph Yee
--
last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx
