[Last-Call] Re: [Emailcore] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-emailcore-rfc5322bis-11

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Joseph,

Thanks for the review. I think this is one of those cases where, "it's been written that way for 23 years; probably best to leave it alone." :-)

pr
--
Pete Resnick https://www.episteme.net/
All connections to the world are tenuous at best

On 13 May 2024, at 10:34, Joseph Yee via Datatracker wrote:

Reviewer: Joseph Yee
Review result: Ready

Greeting all,

I've reviewed the draft "draft-ietf-emailcore-rfc5322bis" version 11 and the
draft is ready with some 'personal preference' nits.

There are places with 'header fields' where 'header section' might be a better term. They are at Section 3.5 1st paragraph and 3rd paragraph as it is about the information in the 'header section'. However, I considered it more into personal preference rather than nits (or editorials that must be fixed). If editors/chairs or others considered 'header fields' is a better term I don't see any concern. 'Header Fields' are used in other places in the draft (such as section 2.2 and 3.6) and they are good that there's no need to change.

Best Regards,
Joseph Yee

--
last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux