Hi Sheng,
Thanks for the review. A couple of comments below:
On 28 Apr 2024, at 23:34, Sheng Jiang via Datatracker wrote:
It is not needed to list RFC2822 & RFC822， the historic documents
far before
RFC5322. The history can be tracked just from the mentioning of
RFC5322.
True, but since there are references in the text to these documents, it
was easier to put them in the list.
The quoting format is not following the normal RFC setting. [...]
It is recommended to replace quoting label, such as BCP14, STD13,
STD18, by
normal RFC +number.
As for the references to the BCPs and STDs, I think this is becoming
more common, but I'll leave that decision to the RFC Editor when they do
their edit. When you say "quoting format", is that what you meant?
The format of requiring language boilerplate is also containing
errors.
I'm not sure what you mean by this. Is it the references format
mentioned above, or did you mean something more?
Thanks again,
pr
--
Pete Resnick https://www.episteme.net/
All connections to the world are tenuous at best
--
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
