Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-jmap-sharing-07

[Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Neil,

 

Can you just add one sentence stating that comprehensive error handling is specified in RFC8620?

 

Thank you,

 

Linda

 

From: Neil Jenkins <neilj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2024 9:33 PM
To: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; ops-dir@xxxxxxxx
Cc: draft-ietf-jmap-sharing.all@xxxxxxxx; IETF JMAP Mailing List <jmap@xxxxxxxx>; last-call@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-jmap-sharing-07

 

Hi Linda,

 

Major Issue: I think it is necessary to have a section on Error Handling to

outline common error scenarios, categorization of error types, and recommended

actions for error resolution.

 

I'm struggling a little to work out exactly what you're looking for here. This document describes a data model for sharing to be used within the JMAP (RFC8620) protocol, which already defines fairly comprehensively how errors should be represented at the request level, method level, and set (create/update/destroy) level. Could you possibly be more specific about where this document introduces a new error handling requirement so I can address it?

 

Cheers,

Neil.

-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call