Re: [Last-Call] [Wish] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-wish-whip-13

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Russ,

I have created new issues and PRs addressing them for both minor concerns raised, please check them and let me know if those PRs will solve the concerns.

On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 12:59 AM Russ Housley via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote:


Minor Concerns:

Figures 2, 3, and 4 are not referenced from body of the document.  It is
best to include a reference in the body that offers some description of what
the reader is expected to learn from the figure.  When I as a Security AD,
the other Security AD was blind.  The text-to-audio system that he used was
surprisingly good, but it could not handle ASCII art.  The discussion of
the figures was vital to him being able to understand a document.  Please
help readers that depend on such tools.

https://github.com/wish-wg/webrtc-http-ingest-protocol/issues/191

Section 4.2 says:

   In order to reduce the complexity of implementing WHIP in both
   clients and Media Servers, WHIP imposes the following restrictions
   regarding WebRTC usage:

I think it would be more clear to say that each of the following subsections
discuss restrictions for WebRTC usage.

https://github.com/wish-wg/webrtc-http-ingest-protocol/issues/189 


Best regards
Sergio
-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux