Hi Ken,
Thanks for the clarification
I have no more qusetions
Roni
On Mon, 8 Apr 2024 at 15:04 Ken Murchison <murch@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Roni,
Thank you for the review. Responses inline below.
On 4/8/24 7:26 AM, Roni Even via Datatracker wrote:
Reviewer: Roni Even Review result: Ready with Nits I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>. Document: draft-murchison-rfc8536bis-?? Reviewer: Roni Even Review Date: 2024-04-08 IETF LC End Date: 2024-04-14 IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat Summary: The document is ready for publication as a standard track rfc with a nit Major issues: Minor issues: Nits/editorial comments: In appendix B2 I noticed that the order of ut/local and standard/wall has changed comparing to RFC8536 but did not see any mention of the change in appendix D. Is this on purpose?
This change was part of the following bullet point:
-- Kenneth Murchison Senior Software Developer Fastmail US LLC
-- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
