Re: [saag] SSH & Ntruprime

To: Randy Presuhn <randy_presuhn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, ietf@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [saag] SSH & Ntruprime
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 15:13:44 -0700
In-reply-to: <265a55d6-2a41-4119-81b3-ed7a29834dfa@alumni.stanford.edu>
References: <CABcZeBPWjXvLh06-DBO3Z0sfeb2hgzqzaSZ-J2-TZ7qesrSraA@mail.gmail.com> <64e81f68-5169-4469-b5a0-2851da912091@lear.ch> <CABcZeBOLKMJb5pw59J072FsfeMFcoz1eZYxa1qpXDLW0nAU0cg@mail.gmail.com> <7b4d38b8-b4c1-412b-8287-bd44d0c512a3@lear.ch> <CABcZeBOQYp49i_JjE7vdg6AjxwyvktW7LFTJ4Mh3jt0bmxxxDQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAN8C-_+QUpU2bTeSFmLB7v1qLirTXtypR2U7D54JeEaeKfSp+Q@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBNtE6PtEdmh-2rTC5y9U7yEL8JVNo1HMjZtOQw-DHjXQQ@mail.gmail.com> <88a1bb16-b0ef-49b3-a661-c343b4faa7a9@nthpermutation.com> <CABcZeBOo7e=jgrkMa4iXYy-x_2o6eZjTpEyezQiu7AKHk4ZhFQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAN8C-_JKbJLB6EU+8zUoeUgYVMkR4ErkSdpvuzr4LYoNcRKccA@mail.gmail.com> <180b6873-d917-4a6f-9fa7-b174e0afae66@nthpermutation.com> <49C35FC4-17C2-48BD-86D4-5D18FD9CF860@akamai.com> <5f281744-d23e-4c54-aabd-741ba2952e45@nthpermutation.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20240325122757.133f0950@elandnews.com> <c140a11a-7930-471a-a3bc-5d4362e5889a@alumni.stanford.edu> <6.2.5.6.2.20240325134324.15278ce8@elandnews.com> <265a55d6-2a41-4119-81b3-ed7a29834dfa@alumni.stanford.edu>

Hi Randy,
At 02:02 PM 25-03-2024, Randy Presuhn wrote:

If it's ok to cite an I-D as "work in progress," how is that
different from "informal documentation" in any meaningful way?


The simple answer is that it is not different.

Regards,

S. Moonesamy

References:
- Re: [saag] SSH & Ntruprime
  - From: Michael StJohns
- Re: [saag] SSH & Ntruprime
  - From: S Moonesamy
- Re: [saag] SSH & Ntruprime
  - From: Randy Presuhn
- Re: [saag] SSH & Ntruprime
  - From: S Moonesamy
- Re: [saag] SSH & Ntruprime
  - From: Randy Presuhn