Dean, On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 04:43:57PM -0400, Dean Anderson wrote: > > That said, it is a reprehensible shame that you are not being given credit > for your work in SPF and RMX. Thanks for that. > We demonstrated that RMX did not solve the problem it set out to > solve. I do not remember that anyone did demonstrate that. On the contrary, RMX solved a major problem in contrast to the current SenderID proposal. Many people, including myself, do receive significant more false bounce messages and spam complaints than spam messages, because spammers abuse my e-mail address or domain. Therefore RMX was designed to verify the envelope sender and it does that job. In contrast, SenderID does not solve that problem. Guess why. > No doubt, the > MARID group chairs do not want to appear to simply re-hash RMX under a > different name. In order to avoid that, they have to pretend it wasn't > written by you. This might be true. Hadmut _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf