On Sat, 24 Feb 2024 at 19:20, Scott Bradner <sob@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > as you have been told many times - IPv6 > The very same IPv6 that transported your message to Scott: Received: from AS4PR02MB7829.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:20b:4c0::21) by AS4PR02MB8621.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:20b:589::19) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.7316.24; Sat, 24 Feb 2024 19:10:35 +0000 Received: from AS4PR02MB7829.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::f9a1:96f8:acba:c3de]) by AS4PR02MB7829.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::f9a1:96f8:acba:c3de%7]) with mapi id 15.20.7292.026; Sat, 24 Feb 2024 19:10:35 +0000 From: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@xxxxxxxxxxx> To: Scott Bradner <sob@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: Adding IPv10 I-D to the IETF 119 meeting agenda --rwf > > On Feb 24, 2024, at 2:10 PM, Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Excuse me, what is other solution you already deployed? > >8
