Re: Adding IPv10 I-D to the IETF 119 meeting agenda

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Khaled

	the IETF has a deployed solution that, if you have a smartphone on most cellular phone networks in the US, you have been using

Scott

(I know this is feeding the troll but sometimes it just feels necessary )

> On Feb 24, 2024, at 11:55 AM, Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Rich,
> 
> I’m still waiting for an official announcement regarding whether the IETF had a solution or my solution can be used, it means disrespectful to say what are you doing at DELL, this is a large organization and they are confident about what they are doing, and they support innovation and I’m honored to work for them heer, if you cannot do the same. “ support innovation”, then why are you working there, anyway, let’s find a way to talk in-person and discuss the technical solution together.
> 
> Kind regards,
> Khaled Omar
> Senior Servuce Deliver Engineer
> DELL Technology, Egypt
> 
> Get Outlook for iOS
> From: Salz, Rich <rsalz@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Saturday, February 24, 2024 6:16:32 PM
> To: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@xxxxxxxxxxx>; ietf <IETF@xxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Adding IPv10 I-D to the IETF 119 meeting agenda   <!-- @font-face {font-family:Wingdings} @font-face {font-family:"Cambria Math"} @font-face {font-family:Calibri} @font-face {font-family:Aptos} p.x_MsoNormal, li.x_MsoNormal, div.x_MsoNormal {margin:0in; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif} a:link, span.x_MsoHyperlink {color:blue; text-decoration:underline} p.x_MsoListParagraph, li.x_MsoListParagraph, div.x_MsoListParagraph {margin-top:0in; margin-right:0in; margin-bottom:0in; margin-left:.5in; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif} span.x_EmailStyle18 {font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif; color:windowtext} .x_MsoChpDefault {font-size:10.0pt} @page WordSection1 {margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in} div.x_WordSection1 {} ol {margin-bottom:0in} ul {margin-bottom:0in} --> We have been down this road with you before. Previous attempts did not end well, with you insisting the document that you submitted and granted rights for be withdrawn, and threatening legal action.
>  
> You think you have a good solution to what you see as a large problem, and you have been unable to convince anyone here.
>  
> Could you please give the green light to the IPv10 I-D to be discussed during the next IETF meeting.
>  
> Unless you find a second person that is willing to work on this, I do not believe the IETF should allocate any time to it. I do not know what you do at DELL, but I assume you have some industry colleagues. Talk to them and see if you can get them to work with you on this. You and I exchanged a few emails privately, and this is what I suggested a month ago.
>  
>     • You can guide me to the correct Work Group, if IntArea still fits, then please confirm.
>  
> Perhaps this is just because you wrote a casual email, but an Area is different from a Work*ing* Group. Look at https://www.ietf.org/standards/process/new-work/ for some information.
>  





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux