On Wed 2024-02-21 09:05:45 -0800, Bron Gondwana via Datatracker wrote:
> It's very well written, and does and excellent job of calling out future work
> and laying out the complete problem space. In that way I think it's a very
> valuable document, and as an informative document it should be published.
Thank you for the kind words! I know that all of the authors hope that
a document like this would be helpful for MUA implementers who are
trying to get it right.
> I do have some concerns about the implementability (particularly, as already
> called out in another review, the "strip things which aren't secure enough when
> quoting for reply" which will likely make users feel there's something wrong
> with their client).
The easiest way to avoid that weird hiccup is to encrypt your reply --
and yeah, if the client can't encrypt a reply to encrypted mail, then
something is indeed wrong :)
> Will client authors refer to this document when designing things?
> Maybe. It's better than not having anything.
100%. If you (or anyone) has any recommendations for how to convince
MUA authors to consider this document, that would be great.
--dkg
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
