--On Wednesday, 18 August, 2004 10:03 -0700 Thomas Gal
<ThomasGal@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Actually if you knew what it meant but weren't that familiar
> with the place of an RFC(someone who's read 2 specs or
> something) you would assume IMHO that an "Internet Standard"
> is NOT a "request for comments".
Sigh. If this is the issue, could someone please initiate a
request to the IESG or Secretariat to change that link to read
"Internet Standards Index and RFC Materials" or something to
that effect (please take the wordsmithing offline too). This
particular issue does not seem to justify bandwidth or
fine-tuning on this list.
Really.
john
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf