Re: [Tools-discuss] formatting follies, was The IETF's email

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



It appears that Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> said:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>Seems about time to take this off the IETF list with a bunch of action
>items for a design team interested in working on this under NOTE WELL:
>
>* Should ping Nathaniel Bornstein who definitely has a dog in this fight
>even if it is only the satisfaction of being right (CCd)
>
>* An ID looking towards being an informational RFC to specify a single
>dialect of Markdown, I think this has to describe what GitHub does because
>that is driving convergence.

Are we serioualy proposing to invent yet another mail format
incompatible with every existing mail format? I find it hard to
believe that is a good use of anyone's time.

R's,
John




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux