Hi Scott, thanks a loto for your review. I'll change the text as you suggested. Best, Mario Il 02/08/2023 14:43, Scott Hollenbeck via Datatracker ha scritto:
Reviewer: Scott Hollenbeck Review result: Ready with Nits I reviewed this document as part of the Applications and Real-Time (ART) Area Review Team's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the ART Area Directors. Document authors, document editors, and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other IETF Last Call comments. I found only one small issue that should be addressed: Section 12.2.1 (Creation of the RDAP Reverse Search Registries) states that "These registries follow the Specification Required process as defined in Section 4.5 of [RFC8126]". It further states that "The designated expert should prevent collisions and confirm that suitable documentation, as described in Section 4.6 of [RFC8126], is available to ensure interoperability". The issue is that no designated expert is involved when the Specification Required process is used to populate a registry. The text could be rewritten like this: "The specification should be written to prevent collisions and confirm that suitable documentation, as described in Section 4.6 of [RFC8126], is available to ensure interoperability"
-- Dott. Mario Loffredo Senior Technologist Technological Unit “Digital Innovation” Institute of Informatics and Telematics (IIT) National Research Council (CNR) via G. Moruzzi 1, I-56124 PISA, Italy Phone: +39.0503153497 Web: http://www.iit.cnr.it/mario.loffredo -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
