[Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search-23

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Reviewer: Scott Hollenbeck
Review result: Ready with Nits

I reviewed this document as part of the Applications and Real-Time (ART) Area
Review Team's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by
the IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the ART
Area Directors.  Document authors, document editors, and WG chairs should treat
these comments just like any other IETF Last Call comments.

I found only one small issue that should be addressed:

Section 12.2.1 (Creation of the RDAP Reverse Search Registries) states that
"These registries follow the Specification Required process as defined in
Section 4.5 of [RFC8126]". It further states that "The designated expert should
prevent collisions and confirm that suitable documentation, as described in
Section 4.6 of [RFC8126], is available to ensure interoperability". The issue
is that no designated expert is involved when the Specification Required
process is used to populate a registry. The text could be rewritten like this:

"The specification should be written to prevent collisions and confirm that
suitable documentation, as described in Section 4.6 of [RFC8126], is available
to ensure interoperability"


-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux