Re: [117attendees] Making meeting attendance more affordable

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Actually, the main reason was that a certain person hated Minneapolis
and swore we would never go back.

If we could get a long-term deal with the Hilton Group, we could
probably return to the Hilton Minneapolis. The venue is still large
enough to hold an IETF meeting I think. Worth looking into, Jay and
Co.

Ole

On Jul 31, 2023, at 14:20, Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@xxxxxxx> wrote:

On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 02:40:58PM -0500, Mary B wrote:
Minneapolis was a great venue for us.  It's never been clear to me why we
stopped going there regularly.

The explanation I heard is a combination of the venues getting clued in to the
fact that we kept coming back so much and thereby demanding more money, and
some amount of us outgrowing the venues.

But I am sad that I didn't get to attend any Minneapolis IETFs -- I heard such
good things!

-Ben


Ole J. Jacobsen
Editor and Publisher
The Internet Protocol Journal
Office: +1 415-550-9433
Cell:   +1 415-370-4628
Docomo: +81 90 3337-9311
Web: protocoljournal.org
E-mail: olejacobsen@xxxxxx
E-mail: ole@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx








[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux