Hi Acee, These issues have been addressed: - The technical sections have been checked against implementations. The implementations have been found to be non-existant. All existing implementations only deal with the P2P case. - We’ve added an informative reference. -14 published with the update. Thanks, Tony > On Jun 5, 2023, at 10:30 AM, Acee Lindem <acee.ietf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Sue, > > Thanks for your review of a fairly large specifying complex functionality required prior IGP expertise. > > Authors, > > Please address Sue’s comments. > > Thanks, > Acee (as document Shepherd) > >> On Jun 5, 2023, at 13:21, Susan Hares via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Reviewer: Susan Hares >> Review result: Ready >> >> The document is written in a clear and concise manner. >> The authors have done an excellent job of making a difficult subject clear and >> readable. >> >> Two technical sections should be checked against implementations of IS-IS with >> dense flooding (section 6.6.2.1 and section 6.6.2.2. I am not implementing so >> this check is beyond my capabilities. >> >> Editorial nit: >> section 3, requirement 3, sentence 2. "Just addressing a complete bipartite >> topology such as K5, 8 is insufficient." An informative reference to K5,8 or a >> bipartite topology might be helpful to readers. This is an optional editorial >> comment. >> >> > -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
