Hi Sue, Thanks for your review of a fairly large specifying complex functionality required prior IGP expertise. Authors, Please address Sue’s comments. Thanks, Acee (as document Shepherd) > On Jun 5, 2023, at 13:21, Susan Hares via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Reviewer: Susan Hares > Review result: Ready > > The document is written in a clear and concise manner. > The authors have done an excellent job of making a difficult subject clear and > readable. > > Two technical sections should be checked against implementations of IS-IS with > dense flooding (section 6.6.2.1 and section 6.6.2.2. I am not implementing so > this check is beyond my capabilities. > > Editorial nit: > section 3, requirement 3, sentence 2. "Just addressing a complete bipartite > topology such as K5, 8 is insufficient." An informative reference to K5,8 or a > bipartite topology might be helpful to readers. This is an optional editorial > comment. > > -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
