Re: Names of standards-track RFCs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Wed, 14 Jul 2004, Daniel Senie wrote:

>
> At the very least, someone reading the title and abstract of a draft (or
> RFC) should be able to come away with enough of a sense of the document to
> know whether it's a document they want to read and is applicable to them,
> or it's not.

Best served in my opinion by expanding acronyms in the body of the
abstract and not the title.  Well more specifically, in the announcement
email subject line since that improves processing of my inbox.

Dave Morris


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]