RE: Names of standards-track RFCs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Agreed.  Spelling things out becomes even more important as
> documents age.  Consider, for example, "IMP" in some of the
> older RFCs.  I suspect many IETF participants have never seen
> or used one, yet this was probably considered "well known" when
> those RFCs were written.

Or consider the RFC that describes Classical IP and ARP over Automatic
Teller Machines...

-- Christian Huitema

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]