> On May 11, 2023, at 3:49 PM, Dale R. Worley <worley@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Michael Welzl <michawe@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >>> On Apr 13, 2023, at 8:32 PM, Dale Worley via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> So to fix this, I recommend that the authors go through the text >>> looking for modal words, [...] >> >> - that seems to be the right way to approach this. It is a very good >> suggestion, many thanks. Indeed, while the case you quote is covered >> by the API draft, it would be terrible if we’d miss any other >> requirement there. > > Fortunately, it sounds like these are all things I would classify as > wording issues. But I do apologize for the sheer number of minor > changes that you'll have to consider. You really shouldn’t! What you did is to improve our spec - what more could we ask for? You did put a lot of effort into this, it is us who have to be thankful! >> As a way forward, my plan is to file issues in our github ( >> https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts >> <https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts> ) for the smaller things >> below, [..] > > Yes, that's certainly sufficient. I am just a reviewer, and for minor > things, I expect nothing more than that the authors consider whether > some improvement should be made (or not). Great - many thanks! Cheers, Michael -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
