Gyan, thank you for the review. I entered a No Objection ballot. Lars > On 3. Apr 2022, at 01:14, Gyan Mishra via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Reviewer: Gyan Mishra > Review result: Ready > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-avtext-framemarking-?? > Reviewer: Gyan Mishra > Review Date: 2022-04-02 > IETF LC End Date: 2022-04-08 > IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat > > Summary: > > This document describes a Frame Marking RTP header extension used to convey > information about video frames that is critical for error recovery and packet > forwarding in RTP middleboxes or network nodes. > > Major issues: > None > > Minor issues: > None > > Nits/editorial comments: > The document is well written and ready for publication. As this is an > experimental what is the scope and length for f the time for the experiment? > What is the goal after the experiment is concluded? This should be stated in > the draft. I see there are IANA considerations and how does that change if any > for allocations once the experiment concludes and this draft progresses to an > IETF standard. > > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > Gen-art@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
