Vijay, thanks for your review. I entered a No Objection ballot. Lars > On 3. Mar 2023, at 23:41, Vijay Gurbani via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Reviewer: Vijay Gurbani > Review result: Ready > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-masque-connect-ip-08 > Reviewer: Vijay K. Gurbani > Review Date: 2023-03-03 > IETF LC End Date: 2023-03-15 > IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat > > Summary: The I-D is ready for moving ahead as a Proposed Standard. > > Major issues: 0 > > Minor issues: 1 > > Nits/editorial comments: 0 > > Minor Issue: > - The I-D alternates between MUST and SHALL, sometimes using both in the same > sentence or paragraph. Between MUST and SHALL, my advise is to be consistent > and pick one. All things being equal, MUST is preferable since a neophyte > reader of the I-D, not well versed in IETF ways, can easily understand the > authority behind MUST. > > > -- > last-call mailing list > last-call@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
