On Wed, 2004-07-07 at 14:34, Tim Chown wrote: > I guess many people will use these tools already, but I thought I'd > just post that the excellent xml2rfc tool now supports the RFC3667 > requirements as per ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1id-guidelines.txt > > See http://xml.resource.org/, v1.24. > > You just need to select the full3667 ipr option, e.g. > > <rfc ipr="full3667" category="... > > in your XML, where you probably had "full2026" beforehand. > > In other words, you must upgrade your xml2rfc before the I-D cutoff rush > next week :) They are already complaining about that since monday with a 'read that url about the new guidelines', while they might just mention that you could turn the ipr option on to the new RFC. You can actually just set the ipr option to 999999 and xml2rfc will be compliant for ever as it just checks if it is lower than a certain version when including some text. Quite odd actually, one can't send internet-drafts@ pgp-signed email because their pegasus mua's can't read it but they do dare to complain about some legal crap in a technical document. Submitting .xml's is not an option either apparently, which I would think would be much easier for them to be checked "ah they have ipr= wrong". xml2rfc could/should warn about this btw, but then again how many times does this change. Greets, Jeroen PS: For debian users, it is not in there (yet)....
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf