It's thrilling to see a thread about protocols in the HRPC context.
Structural changes are needed to IETF protocols to promote human rights considerations. Some of these, like this thread, look like privacy. Others, like the GNAP discussions (https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hrpc/FW78YvFerkFHsrYDFcSWp-SYNqI/), are about human rights impact of forced association.
HRPC needs exactly this kind of discussion instead of distracting changes to the charter in the direction of policy.
I hope HRPC and related groups review our 5-year history as evidence before we suggest changes to the charter.
- Adrian
On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 5:54 PM Dave Taht <dave.taht@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I like to also point at some developments in the marketplace such as
zerotier and especially tailscale, for how things have evolved since.
These new vpn types are very promising, wireguard in particular has
taken off everywhere. It would be good for more IETFers to try these
new tools and/or embrace them.
The rise of the fediverse is also interesting, as are the protocols
and software being designed and deployed by matrix.org.
_______________________________________________
hrpc mailing list
hrpc@xxxxxxxx
https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/hrpc
