I have the same experience with Gmail like Andy.
Hesham
On Wed, Dec 21, 2022, 4:35 AM Andrew G. Malis <agmalis@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Tom,Just my experience, not to promo gmail .... but I'm using gmail for my IETF email, and I've not had your experience. All of my IETF emails arrive in my inbox as expected. I could (if I had to) define a server-side rule to never send anything from ietf.org to junk, but that hasn't been necessary.Cheers,AndyOn Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 5:17 AM tom petch <daedulus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:This month there has been a marked increase in the amount of IETF e-mail
that my ESP classifies as junk which means that I cannot retrieve it
with an MUA and that it will be discarded in three weeks time. Since my
ESP is one of the larger ones, I imagine that others among the 55,000
will be affected
Every RFC announcement from the RFC Editor is junk.
The headers thereof I see show spf=pass dmarc=none action=""
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.947 tagged_above=-999 required=5
Most announcements from the IAB Executive Admnistrative Manager are junk
Some posts to the ARCHD list are junk
Some posts to other WG lists are junk including one I made in response
to a thread.
Something has changed, either in the headers that the IETF is putting on
its e-mails or in the criteria that the ESP uses to classify e-mail, I
would think. The chances of the ESP doing anything helpful (for a
paying customer) I would rate as nil.
Certainly the ESP website has changed. It used to give me the option of
'Do not classify anything from this sender as junk' and that option
seems to have gone.
I have always had a level of false positives for junk and my feedback is
always ignored. Usually, the junk is an e-mail from an unfamiliar name
about and unfamiliar topic, sometimes several from the same person but
junking the RFC Editor and the IAB take this to a new level.
Thoughts?
Tom Petch
