Hi Martin, Thanks for addressing my comments. Regards, Bo -----Original Message----- From: Martin Thomson [mailto:mt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Monday, December 12, 2022 5:33 PM To: Wubo (lana) <lana.wubo@xxxxxxxxxx>; ops-dir@xxxxxxxx Cc: draft-ietf-ohai-ohttp.all@xxxxxxxx; last-call@xxxxxxxx; ohai@xxxxxxxx Subject: Re: Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-ohai-ohttp-05 Thanks for reading Bo. I've made corrections, except as noted: https://github.com/ietf-wg-ohai/oblivious-http/pull/233 On Mon, Dec 12, 2022, at 20:09, Bo Wu via Datatracker wrote: > 1. Section 2: > It is suggested to add the relationship with “target resource” and > “Server”. As “Server” is used in abstract and introduction, Section 2 > directly uses “target resource” instead of “Server”. This is applicable to “Target Resource” > definition in section 2.2. This is one for which we lean on HTTP. I've added an explicit note to that effect. > 2. Section 2 > AEAD : It would be better to expand on the first use. https://www.rfc-editor.org/materials/abbrev.expansion.txt lists AEAD now, so I think that means we can avoid expanding it. It really doesn't help that much to provide the expansion - the acronym isn't very helpful. > 3. The following spelling are duplicated twice: > Section 4.3: request request > Section 4.4: context context These were noted by other reviewers. > Section 7: with with I think you are the first to notice. -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
