Sheng, Russ Thank you for your comments and proposals. I will change the reference to RFC 2510 to RFC 6712 with the next update. Hendrik > Von: Russ Housley <housley@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > RFC 2986 is already in the downref registry, so that is not a concern. > > The reference to RFC 2510 could be updated to point to Section 3 of RFC > 6712. > > I think that the reference to RFC 5246 should be kept as it is. > > Russ > > > > On Nov 22, 2022, at 6:15 PM, Sheng Jiang via Datatracker > <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Reviewer: Sheng Jiang > > Review result: Ready with Nits > > > > I have reviewed this document as part of the IntArea directorate's ongoing > > effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. > Comments that > > are not addressed in last call may be included in AD reviews during the > IESG > > review. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just > like > > any other last call comments. > > > > Document: draft-ietf-lamps-lightweight-cmp-profile-15 > > Reviewer: Sheng Jiang > > Review Date: 2022-11-23 > > Result: Ready with Nits > > > > This Standards Track document specifies a lightweight PKI management > > operations based on matured CMP (Certificate Management Protocol), > > CRMF (Certificate Request Message Format, and HTTP-based or CoAP- > based > > transfer. The mechanism is operable. This document is well-written > > and READY with minor Nits (below) for publication. > > > > Downref: Normative reference to an Informational RFC 2986 > > Two obsolete informational references: > > RFC 2510 has obsoleted by RFC 4210 > > RFC 5246 has obsoleted by RFC 8446 > > > > Regards, > > > > Sheng -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
