On 2022-11-06, at 15:19, Mark Nottingham <mnot@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Appendix A has a data definition for the JSON form in the current >> json-schema.org language version, but none in CDDL (RFC 8610). >> I propose adding the CDDL in the same spirit (informative definition), >> see PR#59 [2]. > > I don't think I can take this without some WG discussion. CDDL is not really used by the HTTP API community, so this feels more like advocacy than I'm comfortable with. I offered this as a small service to the people who want to do something in the space between 7807bis and RFC9290. But yes, the WG would have to like adding this, and that is not my discussion. Grüße, Carsten -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
