Re: [Last-Call] [pim] Last Call: <draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-proxy-yang-07.txt> (A Yang Data Model for IGMP/MLD Proxy) to Proposed Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On October 28, 2022 at 4:37:41 AM, tom petch wrote:
> On 28/10/2022 07:31, Hongji Zhao wrote:


Hi!

> > The last submission time for the I-D submission was 2022-10-24 23:59 UTC,
> > so I couldn't update the draft now. I will update it as long as I-D
> > submission is available.
>
> You might want to wait until the end of Last Call so that all comments
> are made against the same version, even if the same comments are made
> more than once. Some ADs like this approach, others like the I-D to be
> updated as it goes.

Waiting until the window opens is fine.


> I do not know what the answer is for addresses in IPv4 examples, short
> of writing an I-D to ask IANA to assign a block (when the submission
> window opens:-). This is not an issue for most WG but seems to be so
> here. I see other uses of 225. but think that wrong.

Please take a look at rfc6676 (Multicast Addresses for Documentation).


Thanks!

Alvaro.

-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call



[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux