Keith, On 26/10/2022 22:40, Keith Moore wrote:
So while I understand and accept the argument that we shouldn't use satire or sarcasm in IETF, I think it will take time for English speakers who are accustomed to that convention, to learn to not respond to such arguments in the conventional way.
IMO the above is not correct. A tiny tiny proportion of IETF emails I've read (and I've read a lot) contain any satire or sarcasm. Almost everyone has learned to not do that already, years ago, without having to be told or get training, perhaps largely because it's utterly obvious. It's possible to disagree with or not be satisfied by the proposed PR-action but better to not bring in any counterfactual propositions while doing so. S.
Attachment:
OpenPGP_0x5AB2FAF17B172BEA.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
