Re: [Last-Call] Global whitelist was Re: Last Call: BCP 83 PR-Action Against

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 10/25/22 10:07 AM, Paul Wouters wrote:
On Oct 25, 2022, at 12:05, Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 10/25/2022 9:34 AM EDT Paul Wouters <paul@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Tue, 25 Oct 2022, Lloyd W wrote:

https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/global-whitelist
interesting that the terminology furore of the past few years and the subsequent NIST recommendations (here:
suggesting use of allowlist/denylist) have not reached far into the IETF.
It is a mistake that we will correct.


Since it's a list we are all on, I would like to suggest an alternative name.  How about Master-list?
I consider this email inappropriate and unprofessional. It was a follow up to another one of your emails that as similarly inappropriate and unprofessional.

Additionally, you keep misusing the last-call list for off-topic messages.

I ask that the moderators evaluate these messages.

Paul

  You know what's inappropriate and unprofessional? An IESG member
abusing his authority to chill speech that he doesn't like.

  Dan.

--
"The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to
escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." -- Marcus Aurelius

--
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux