Roman,
Can the mechanism specified in the draft be used to validate the Virtual Network IDs of SD-WAN edge devices?
For example, an SDWAN edge deployed in a remote site, say a shopping mall, might advertise the routes and client VPN IDs to the BGP Route-Reflector (RR). The RR needs to validate the Client's IDs are legitimate. Can the mechanism specified in the draft do the job?
Thanks, Linda
On 10/20/22, 10:36 PM, "Linda Dunbar" <linda.dunbar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Roman,
With you bringing back the explanation, all makes sense to me now. Wish your explanation is incorporated into the document.
Thanks, Linda
On 10/20/22, 6:53 PM, "Roman Danyliw" <rdd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thanks for the re-review Linda.
ACME WG: here is the thread from the IETF LC where proposed changes were discussed: https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmailarchive.ietf.org%2Farch%2Fmsg%2Flast-call%2FnujBgHd6ZKHY6fG58ZWBKzFGVWs%2F&data=05%7C01%7Clinda.dunbar%40futurewei.com%7C3d47157879904a302e3008dab2f65009%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C638019068235813966%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=t83ICajIF%2FEIKzibHtGs0T9FFSQpSFmBxKdxxgGHkPY%3D&reserved=0
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Linda Dunbar via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2022 6:55 PM
> To: ops-dir@xxxxxxxx
> Cc: acme@xxxxxxxx; draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid.all@xxxxxxxx; last-call@xxxxxxxx
> Subject: Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid-10
>
> Reviewer: Linda Dunbar
> Review result: Has Issues
>
> I have reviewed this document as part of the Ops area directorate's ongoing
> effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These
> comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Ops area directors.
> Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any
> other last call comments.
>
> This document specifies an extension to ACME protocol which allows an ACME
> server to validate the Delay-Tolerant Networking Node ID for an ACME client.
>
> I had the following comments for the -07 version. I don't think the latest
> version (-10) resolved my comments.
>
> Issues:
>
> The document didn't describe how the Node ID described in this document is
> related to the Delay Tolerant Network. I see the mechanism can be equally
> used in any network. What are the specifics related to the "Delay Tolerant
> Network"?
> It would be helpful if the document adds a paragraph explaining the specific
> characteristics of the Delay-Tolerant Network that require the additional
> parameters/types used for validating the Node-ID for an ACME client.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Linda Dunbar
>
--
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
