Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid-10

[Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Roman, 

With you bringing back the explanation, all makes sense to me now. Wish your explanation is incorporated into the document. 
Thanks, Linda

On 10/20/22, 6:53 PM, "Roman Danyliw" <rdd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

    Thanks for the re-review Linda.  

    ACME WG: here is the thread from the IETF LC where proposed changes were discussed: https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmailarchive.ietf.org%2Farch%2Fmsg%2Flast-call%2FnujBgHd6ZKHY6fG58ZWBKzFGVWs%2F&amp;data=05%7C01%7Clinda.dunbar%40futurewei.com%7C3d47157879904a302e3008dab2f65009%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C638019068235813966%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=t83ICajIF%2FEIKzibHtGs0T9FFSQpSFmBxKdxxgGHkPY%3D&amp;reserved=0

    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Linda Dunbar via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx>
    > Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2022 6:55 PM
    > To: ops-dir@xxxxxxxx
    > Cc: acme@xxxxxxxx; draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid.all@xxxxxxxx; last-call@xxxxxxxx
    > Subject: Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid-10
    > 
    > Reviewer: Linda Dunbar
    > Review result: Has Issues
    > 
    > I have reviewed this document as part of the Ops area directorate's ongoing
    > effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These
    > comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Ops area directors.
    > Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any
    > other last call comments.
    > 
    > This document specifies an extension to ACME protocol which allows an ACME
    > server to validate the Delay-Tolerant Networking Node ID for an ACME client.
    > 
    > I had the following comments for the -07 version. I don't think the latest
    > version (-10) resolved my comments.
    > 
    > Issues:
    > 
    > The document didn't describe how the Node ID described in this document is
    > related to the Delay Tolerant Network. I see the mechanism can be equally
    > used in any network. What are the specifics related to the "Delay Tolerant
    > Network"?
    > It would be helpful if the document adds a paragraph explaining the specific
    > characteristics of the Delay-Tolerant Network that require the additional
    > parameters/types used for validating the Node-ID for an ACME client.
    > 
    > Thank you,
    > 
    > Linda Dunbar
    > 


-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call