On 10/11/22 21:38, John C Klensin wrote:
If they intend the first, then my position is that the path by which we have gotten here is sufficiently flawed that Dan should asked once again to cut back on the behavior the community finds obnoxious and disruptive, warned that the next invocation of BCP 83 (if needed) will almost certainly be more definitive, but otherwise let off the hook this time. If the second, I'm happy about that more nuanced approach. So, IMO, the question is reasonable and should be answered precisely because this is not normal document processing.
Assuming IESG were to do something similar to that, it might help if they were to actually describe specifically what is obnoxious and/or disruptive, by referencing specific sections of applicable IETF Consensus documents.
Keith -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
