Thanks for the clarification, Paul! Who among us hasn't pushed the wrong datatracker button?
-Ekr
On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 8:06 PM Paul Wouters <paul@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, 11 Oct 2022, Salz, Rich wrote:
> Subject: Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-knodel-e2ee-definition-07.txt>
> (Definition of End-to-end Encryption) to Informational RFC
My apologies for the confusion. This document is not in Last Call yet. I
pressed some wrong buttons in the datatracker.
> In response to Paul bringing the draft up, there were several major concerns raised. There was no feedback from the author, let alone no new draft that
> addressed any of the issues. There is also no explanation why Paul brought it up, although there was the implication that it was being considered as
> AD-sponsored. Is that correct? If so, why is it now being considered as an inidividual submission?
I am AD sponsoring it, but that does mean it needs IETF consensus. That
is why I brought it up for discussion on the saag list. There is clearly
no consensus yet, and I attempted to put the document into the AD
followup state, while accidentally causing an IETF Last Call.
Sorry about the confusion,
Paul
--
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
-- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
