|
>> That one would be on each and every individual network and security device vendor in the world. Basically, on the same chip & software vendors who have largely delayed IPv6 transition for decades. I don’t think this is a dilemma. >> There's no single and/or dominant international authority that could force these vendors into protocol adoption, if that's what you're asking of. Otherwise, hypothetically, IPv6 adoption would've been enforced that way long ago. IPv6 deployed already but not used, but with IPv10, it needs to be deployed as IPv6 but it has no usage as IPv6, just a matter of updating vendor’s devices. Best regards, Khaled Omar From: Töma Gavrichenkov <ximaera@xxxxxxxxx> Peace, On Sun, 9 Oct 2022, 11:54 am Khaled Omar, <eng.khaled.omar@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
That one would be on each and every individual network and security device vendor in the world. Basically, on the same chip & software vendors who have largely delayed IPv6 transition for decades. There's no single and/or dominant international authority that could force these vendors into protocol adoption, if that's what you're asking of. Otherwise, hypothetically, IPv6 adoption would've been enforced that way long ago. -- Töma |
