Hello Brian,
Your opinions are always appreciated.
>> It hasn't been much of a real life problem, so far, since most services are IPv4-only or dual stack.
Later on, we will see IPv6-only hosts in addition to IPv4-only and Dual stack hosts, so can you tell me what IPv6-only hosts can do to communicate with IPv4 only hosts and vice versa in a single large network?
Best regards,
Khaled Omar
-----Original Message-----
From: ietf <ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Brian E Carpenter
Sent: Saturday, October 1, 2022 4:46 AM
To: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Scott O. Bradner <sob@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: ietf@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: IPv6 adoption - IPv10 is the future.
On 01-Oct-22 15:06, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
> The fundamental brokenness in the IPv6 transition strategy is that an IPv4 device cannot reach an IPv6 service.
If you believe that, I suggest starting at RFC 8215 and working backwards. NAT46 has been on the radar for many years.
In practice, the CDNs can solve this too, as well as the other way round.
It hasn't been much of a real life problem, so far, since most services are IPv4-only or dual stack.
Brian
