It is not a different protocol Scott, it is a new header that contains both IP versions through an extension header to either an IPv4 packet or IPv6 packet, which is tunneling. I already explained that before, why people still insists it is a different protocol and I kept saying it is not but it is a solution through adding a new tunnel that contains both IP versions. Khaled Omar -----Original Message----- From: Scott Bradner <sob@xxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2022 9:57 PM To: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@xxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Vasilenko Eduard <vasilenko.eduard@xxxxxxxxxx>; ietf@xxxxxxxx Subject: Re: IPv6 adoption - IPv10 is the future. and starting over with a different protocol would speed up the process? NOT! almost all of the computers and networking devices now being manufactured in the world support IPv6 so utilization is not a question of support rather it is a question need - not everyone needs something other than IPv4 at this time Scott (yes, I know I should not have fed the troll but ...) > On Sep 20, 2022, at 2:05 PM, Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The issue is, if the world will cross 50% this year, and with this slow progress, as the percentage was 25% 5 years ago, the internet will face the division due to blocks of IPv4 only hosts and big percent of IPv6 only hosts, which is not good at all. > > Also, China is already there. > > <image001.png> > > Khaled Omar > > From: Vasilenko Eduard <vasilenko.eduard@xxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2022 7:58 PM > To: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@xxxxxxxxxxx>; ietf@xxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: IPv6 adoption - IPv10 is the future. > > +8% (0.5B users) because China is not visible on this stat. > Would the world cross 50% this year? Probably. > Ed/ > From: ietf [mailto:ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Khaled Omar > Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2022 8:13 PM > To: ietf@xxxxxxxx > Subject: IPv6 adoption - IPv10 is the future. > > Hi IETFers, > > I still see no progress happens in the IPv6 deployment all over the world and 5 years ago when we started to do analysis we found out now that the migration process going so slow and now the percentage according to google hits 40% which gives an alarm of the internet division due to finding blocks of IPv6 only hosts and IPv4 only hosts in the internet. > > <image002.png> > > I don’t know why till now the IETF didn’t take the IPv10 draft seriously into consideration as it would be applied since it was developed and it wouldn’t take so much time to be deployed in the internet. > > I still see no better solution, not because I’m the IPv10 I-D author, but because I keep watching what’s going on on the internet and I see the red flag case will be raised soon due to the incompatibility between IPv4 and IPv6. > > I hope I get positive replies because of course I’m not aware with everything happening at the IETF. > > Have a good day everyone. > > Best regards, > > Khaled Omar > Senior Service Delivery Engineer > DELL Technologies, Egypt
