On 10/4/22 22:32, Adam Roach wrote:
I'm saying this as a fellow participant, as I clearly left behind any
vestiges of authority I have in this organization some while ago. I
hope you take it in the spirit in which it is intended.
At the moment, your messages constitute more than 1 in every 5
messages in this thread, and they're conveying ever diminishing
information about your position on the action. I know you're
formulating a longer, structured response to this Last Call, and I
imagine that the IESG looks forward to reading that input as part of
its evaluation. In the meanwhile, it would make room for others to
digest the contents of this thread and formulate their own opinions
and responses if it were not quite so high volume. No one else has the
power to single-handledly reduce the volume of this thread by over
20%, so I'm imploring you -- as the one person in the unique position
to do so -- that you do.
I think I understand you. It's an inherent problem with the way we do
discussions that a crowd can effectively silence objections from a
minority by drowning them out with messages. I simply do not agree
that it's the minority's job to silence themselves so that the crowd can
drown them out.
I will, however, try to avoid repeating myself if I've already raised
the same objection.
Keith
--
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
