Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: BCP 83 PR-Action Against Dan Harkins

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Lloyd W <lloyd.wood=40yahoo.co.uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: BCP 83 PR-Action Against Dan Harkins
From: Keith Moore <moore@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2022 19:23:26 -0400
Cc: Ted Lemon <mellon@xxxxxxxxx>, last-call@xxxxxxxx
Feedback-id: i5d8c41f0:Fastmail
In-reply-to: <1984822611.1375940.1664925734733@email.ionos.com>
References: <46e9b2e4-ec37-1e61-0e02-e2a38975f7d1@network-heretics.com> <301332D9-6F6A-4BC4-A7EE-10E4F9821F11@yahoo.co.uk> <1984822611.1375940.1664925734733@email.ionos.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.11.0

On 10/4/22 19:22, Timothy Mcsweeney wrote:

On 10/04/2022 7:19 PM EDT Lloyd W <lloyd.wood=40yahoo.co.uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

gee, Harkins didn't get consensus before bullying.


Although it looks like the IESG did.


A mob is not a consensus.


--
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call

References:
- Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: BCP 83 PR-Action Against Dan Harkins
  - From: Keith Moore
- Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: BCP 83 PR-Action Against Dan Harkins
  - From: Lloyd W
- Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: BCP 83 PR-Action Against Dan Harkins
  - From: Timothy Mcsweeney

Prev by Date: Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: BCP 83 PR-Action Against Dan Harkins
Next by Date: Re: [Last-Call] OT: change BCP 83 [Re: Last Call: BCP 83 PR-Action Against Dan Harkins]
Previous by thread: Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: BCP 83 PR-Action Against Dan Harkins
Next by thread: Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: BCP 83 PR-Action Against Dan Harkins
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Mhonarc] [Fedora Users]

Powered by Linux