Reviewer: Ines Robles Review result: Ready with Nits I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-homenet-naming-architecture-dhc-options-?? Reviewer: Ines Robles Review Date: 2022-10-04 IETF LC End Date: 2022-10-04 IESG Telechat date: 2022-10-20 Summary: This document defines DHCPv6 options so an Homenet Naming Authority (HNA) can automatically proceed to the appropriate configuration and outsource the authoritative naming service for the home network. The document is well written and easy to understand. I have two minor questions as nits. Major issues: None Minor issues: None Nits/editorial comments/Questions: 1- Have you consider in this document RFC 7227- Guidelines for Creating New DHCPv6 Options -? If yes, should it be added in the references? If not, why not? 2- Page 9: "The use of DHCPv6 options provides a similar level of trust as the one used to provide the IP prefix." In which features are similar? In which features are dissimilar? Thanks for this document, Ines. -- last-call mailing list last-call@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
