Wow that certainly escalated quickly. Was it b/c he questioned the original warning? I guess I missed more abuse directed at people. It seemed like the follow on discussions were about disagreeing with the original warning. I agreed with the original warning, but getting further restricted for questioning a moderation decision seems to be a different thing (and probably ill-advised). Thanks, Chris. IETF Moderators <moderators@xxxxxxxx> writes:
Hi all, We wanted to let the list know that the Moderators team for ietf@xxxxxxxx (described in more detail at [1]) has determined that Masataka Ohta has engaged in a pattern of abuse based on their recent messages to this list [2][3]. Their posting rights to the ietf@xxxxxxxx mailing list have been restricted for the next 14 days. We encourage everyone to review the IETF discussion list charter [4] and avoid postings that include uncivil commentary [5]. Thanks, Dhruv Dhody on behalf of the Moderators team for ietf@xxxxxxxx [1] https://www.ietf.org/how/lists/discussion/ [2] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/bOI2y4p8AnyEGzOe-4C4wpBhTpo/ [3] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/mg6pT8Po-QcsB8g6N1z2aFSbqLw/ [4] https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9245.html [5] https://github.com/ietf/Moderators/blob/main/unprofessional-commentary.md
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
