Hi Stephen, Regarding current process. I think that this is covered by BCP 45, https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9245.html, section 3, last paragraph: Because a moderator serves at the discretion of the IETF Chair -- even if the IETF Chair is not otherwise involved in the operation of the moderator team -- any moderator decision can be appealed to the IETF Chair, per [RFC2026]. Decisions by the IETF Chair can be appealed to the IESG as whole, again per [RFC2026]. Regards, Rob > -----Original Message----- > From: ietf <ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Stephen Farrell > Sent: 24 August 2022 20:40 > To: Scott Bradner <sob@xxxxxxxxx>; IETF Moderators <moderators@xxxxxxxx> > Cc: ietf@xxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: Notification to list from the IETF Moderators team > > > Hiya, > > On 24/08/2022 20:00, Scott Bradner wrote: > > agreeing with John - seems to me that this is a case of the cure > > causing significantly more problems than the original issue. > I don't think I quite a agree with John here, but I'd also > like to express my unease at the PR-action here, even though > I thought the public "calling-out" of the OP's repeated use > of such language was fair enough. > > Apologies to the moderators though - I know moderating a list > like this is almost impossible so I'm sorry to 2nd-guess your > decision here, but I'd suggest you maybe re-consider or punt > this to the IESG if the current process allows for that. > > Cheers, > S.
