Echoing a previous post, I’m not sure sustainability is part of our skill set. If we were to try to forcibly add it, I suspect we’d get the same level of response security originally got: “sustainability is not specified in this document”. Sent using a machine that autocorrects in interesting ways... > On Aug 5, 2022, at 2:26 AM, Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Perhaps it is time for a new mandatory section in RFCs: sustainability?
