Re: [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-uta-rfc7525bis-09

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 12:29 PM Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

And, surprisingly enough, that's already mentioned in the applicability
statement section of this document:

    This document does not discuss the use of TLS in constrained-node
    networks [RFC7228].  For recommendations regarding the profiling of
    TLS and DTLS for small devices with severe constraints on power,
    memory, and processing resources, the reader is referred to [RFC7925]
    and [I-D.ietf-uta-tls13-iot-profile].

Hi,

I read those words, but I didn't understand them.

I would suggest capitalizing "Constrained-Node Networks" so it's clear that reading is required. That is a document I have never seen, and I do read a lot of them. I would also suggest moving the word "severe", since that term is really from RFC7228.

thanks,
Rob

-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux